Cult of the Individual

In the Social Equation post we discussed how one could see the construction of civilisation as equalling the balance of human emotions. As societies grew in density so formal frameworks were established to help order the chaos and provide balance. Until relatively recently religion was an important component in providing meaning to human emotion and existence. For thousands of years this model existed to provide a violent balance to our civilisation. As the time spent on searching for food and daily survival has decreased and been replaced by the ‘intellectual hunt’ so science has brought into question the literal interpretation of religious stories.

In 1859 Charles Darwin published his theory of evolution which fundamentally conflicted with the Christian teachings, that Man is descended from Adam and Eve, and proposed a logical answer to one of the great unknown questions. For those looking for answers to the meaning of life it seemed that science now had more relevance than books such as the Bible and so the strength of religion as a framework within society declined. Science only describes the physical and neglects intangible ideas such as morality and spirituality that can’t be measured but which form an important part of the balance of human emotion.

Modern society has quickly looked to fill the void left by religion with the cult of the individual where we replace our belief in God with a guiding belief in ourselves. Now we Love ourselves and money, we Hope and aspire to more material possessions, we Fear growing old/fat/ugly and not matching the images portrayed in the media and our Hate has maybe been channelled into computer games but appears less prominent as an emotion at present. It is as if Greed has now replaced Hate as the opposite driving emotion to Love within the Social Equation. There are still issues of racism, religious and political intolerance but what few wars we have are driven by greed for oil and money rather than hatred of an ideal or group of people. Even the London 2011 riots were fuelled by greed for new trainers and televisions rather than any social, political or racial hatred. Without religious stories to guide us morally we rely on the media of art, music and film which has worked hard to promote the cult of the individual and the positive nature of financial greed.

The Social Equation (cult of the individual):          Civilisation = (Hope + Love) / (Fear +Greed)

Maybe we should congratulate ourselves that we have managed to replace Hate with Greed in the Social Equation but this has itself created new challenges. The physical embodiment of Hate was war and this acted as a consumption mechanism to justify society’s need to work to pay for armaments and maintain national security. The armaments were then destroyed in war along with hundreds of thousands of people and the process of growth began again. Society’s need to work has now been replaced with Greed and its physical incarnation consumerism but this has created unsustainable levels of material consumption. Where war levelled society and highlighted the insignificance of material possessions and the importance of Hope and Love, Greed hasn’t created a shock which enables society to rebalance its priorities and emotions. The Credit Crunch is the alternative to war but unfortunately it has failed to nudge people into consuming less resources or reassessing their values. We have a serious challenge to fill the void left by religion with a convincing new framework.

In the next post we will look at how a Carbon Community could provide an alternative framework for the balance of human emotion but will ask the question are there any better solutions?

The_black_rose_emblem

Greed is the Root of all Evil?

 

The Social Equation

The term civilisation refers to complex human cultures that are generally urbanised. This post will propose that stable civilisations require human emotion to be balanced and that various frameworks exist to ensure this equilibrium. In the next post we will look at how scientific thinking has altered the balance of emotions within society and in the third post of this series we will discuss what alternatives exist for the future.

 

Having looked at various systems around the world we began to notice that many laws, religions and beliefs exist to balance human emotion and provide meaning to life. For instance a religious framework, such as Christianity provides balance through Love of ‘God’, Hope for a better life in Heaven and redemption from sin, Fear of Hell and damnation and Hate for other religions that drove the Crusades in the 11, 12 and 13th centuries. For thousands of years this model has existed to provide a violent balance to our civilisation. Over time other frameworks and ideologies have approached the structure of civilisation from different viewpoints but all have the same goal of creating social balance.

 

The Social Equation is a simple mechanism to help think about the balance of emotion in society and will hopefully lead to some debate from our readers as to how this can evolve?

            

The Social Equation:        Civilisation  =  (Hope + Love) / (Fear + Hate)

 

The Social equation takes four primal emotions which in a dense urban environment must be kept in balance with no extreme examples causing significant harm to other humans. The choice of emotions is up for debate as they are not based on the list produced by Parrot in 2001 (love, joy, surprise, anger, sadness, fear) but on common English parlance where we talk of hopes and fears as well as love and hate as general opposites. Humans are biologically programmed to enjoy Love because it is this emotion that binds families together that provide the support system for the next generation. Hope is the optimistic component of human emotion, a driving belief that things will improve and therefore life is worth living. Hope can also blind society to its problems which is why emotions of Fear exist to provide a balance and inspire action. Hate is the emotion which has led to many wars and acts as a social leveller and driver but which in the next post we will argue has been replaced in the equation due to the inhumanity of its results.

 

Each emotion used in the Social Equation has positive qualities in moderation and its mere existence acts as a foil to its opposite providing the ability to compare the benefits of being in one emotional state against another. Put simply you cannot know what Love is without Hate as an opposing emotion for comparison. We will question this idea in the next post but for the moment let’s look at each emotion in turn and how its extreme can be dangerous to social balance. Hope is the believe in a positive outcome. Taken to extremes false hope occurs where the person bases their belief around fantasy or an extremely unlikely outcome which then leads to ineffective stagnation. For example Britain could have hoped Hitler wouldn’t have tried to attack but blind hope would have indeed led to an invasion. In contrast the opposing emotion of Fear can also be paralysing in the extreme where it resigns the human to their anticipated fate. Love as they say can be blind or blinding, leading the obsessed to carry out acts that are not rational to their own well being. Up until 1970 French law still recognised a crime of passion as a valid defence where love had led to murder. In contrast we have the emotion of Hate which in extremes leads to murder or war. Those with a greater historical knowledge will probably be able to suggest other relevant events?

 

Extremes of emotion cause instability and society puts in place frameworks such as law and religion to help find an equilibrium. One could also argue that Love and Hope are emotions that lead to contentment and inactivity while emotions such as Fear and Hate generally provoke a response that drives us to action. It is the push and pull of these emotions that keeps society in balance whilst also evolving slowly in response to the environment.

 

In the next post we will look at how science has changed the power of our balancing frameworks and how the cult of the individual has modified the Social Equation. As always please feel free to comment and add further examples.

 

Leviathan

 The balance of emotional power